No Limit Holdem

WWdN – Euro tourney report

April 23rd, 2006  |  Published in No Limit Holdem, Online Poker, Tournaments

My run of good results in WWdN Eurofriendly tournaments at PokerStars continued on Friday. After driving like a maniac to get home in time for the start (and getting back a few minutes late), I was there until the bitter end again, this time finishing in second place after I won the first one back in February.

WWdN Final Table 21/04/06

Obviously you have to be delighted with such a good result, but I was still a little bit disappointed not to win it again. There were a couple of occasions when I had big chip leads at the final table – double the number of chips that anyone else had when we were down to seven, and more significantly, having 30k of the 55k in play when we were down to three. But perhaps that’s being super picky. I thought I played really well, but just got out-played heads-up by fellow British poker blogger TanOrpheus.

I’m really taking a liking to tournaments with longer blind intervals, so I should probably make more of an effort to look for non-WWdN tournaments with similar blind structures to play in.

As I said, I got home a few minutes late so I missed the first couple of hands at my table. That was long enough for Pauly to bust out though, although I didn’t see quite how he managed it. I don’t suppose he’s going to mention it now that he’s out in Vegas at the WPT Championship either, so if anybody was on that table and saw what happened, let me know. All I saw was the aftermath – somebody saying, “wow, that was a brave call” in the chat window.

Incidently, if I ever come across ‘Jemad19′ at the tables again, dude, I’ll be giving you more than the $1 you asked me and Tan to lend you while we were trying to concentrate on playing heads-up. How anybody has the nerve to just walk in like that at the end of a tournament and ask to borrow money is just beyond me.

As ever though, it was a fun tournament to play in. Thanks again to Wil for setting it up. Somehow, I managed to avoid playing at the same table as him again though. Never mind, one of these days.

First WWdN Euro-Friendly Tourney report

February 11th, 2006  |  Published in No Limit Holdem, Online Poker, Tournaments

The first ever Wil Wheaton-sponsored Euro-friendly Friday tournament was played yesterday at Poker Stars and I’m delighted to say that I was fortunate enough to win it. “Over the moon” may not be the right phrase, but it’s the first one that comes to mind.
WWdN Eurofriendly Final Table - 10th Feb 2006
I’ll spare you all an in-depth analysis of the big hands. :-) Instead, you can read Wil’s roundup of the tournament on the Card Squad website here:

http://www.cardsquad.com/2006/02/10/results-for-eurofriendly-friday

I was really pleased with the way I played, particularly when I was heads-up with Change100 and I came back from almost a 6 to 1 chip deficit (34k to 6k) to eventually win after a tense thirty minute battle. It was pretty surreal for me to play against other bloggers like CJ whose work I’ve been an admirer of for quite a while, as well as having Pauly and Wil in there commenting at the end and asking me where I was from. That was really cool actually! :-)
Thanks to Wil for putting the tourney on at a time when I could play and for creating a blind structure that rewarded good, patient play. Thanks to the other European players for supporting me at the end too, especially Sires (even though the talk of Chili was making me very hungry after almost three hours of playing on an empty stomach.)
See you all next time,
Dave

EPT Scandinavian Open ends

January 23rd, 2006  |  Published in No Limit Holdem, Tournaments

The EPT Scandinavian Open finished on Sunday night with Denmark’s own Mads Andersen taking the first prize of 2.5m Kr (that’s £235,000, or $420,000) after entering the final table with a big chip lead. The final table took ten hours to play (the longest EPT final table so far) and incredibly, the players came within half an hour of the casino’s official closing time!! (Yes, some European casinos close in the early hours). I’ll bet EPT boss John Duthie was a little nervous given the amount of trouble he’s had organising venues for the EPT, and in particular after the fiasco in Barcelona last year. This month’s Card Player Europe has an article all about how Duthie put together the EPT here. It’s interesting to read about why there are hardly ever any cash games at EPT events.
The two PokerStars qualifiers who made the final table (Markus Gonsalves and Anina Gundesen) finished 5th and 6th respectively. Anina had said she wasn’t intimidated by any of her opponents because she had no idea who any of them were. I must confess that I’d barely heard of any of them either.
As ever, the PokerStars blog has a detailed final table report, in which writer Howard Swains deserves a special award for straining the “playground of the rich” metaphor about as far it it will go:

http://www.pokerstarsblog.com/2006/01/copenhagen-ept-final-table-report.html

Virgin Freerolls report

December 4th, 2005  |  Published in No Limit Holdem, Online Poker, Tournaments

It’s about time I posted my report on the five $1000 freerolls that Virgin Poker ran to celebrate their re-launch last weekend. Those five nights reminded me just how baffling and frustrating and exhilarating tournament poker can be. In a way, I was kind of glad when the five nights were over so I could go back to what I was doing, which was working hard to improve my limit game, but this was an enjoyable little diversion for a few days. It’ll be interesting to see if Virgin can hang on to a lot of the players who came to these tournaments. I saw a lot of different names from one night to the next, and probably about 99% of them were British too. The number of players involved each night varied from 230 to 295, which isn’t too shabby. I was impressed by the fact that each player started with 2000 chips rather than 1500 (or the 800 you get at some places), so I may stick around and play a few more cheap tournaments there.

Things started really well for me in the first freeroll on Thursday. For the first time ever, I got myself into the late stages of a tournament and into a position where I actually felt that I had as good a chance as anyone to win it. It was very rewarding to see evidence of the work I’ve put into learning to play no-limit tournaments paying off. I comfortably managed to survive that tricky first hour which often trips me up; where the lunatics who call all-in bets with bottom pair get weeded out. I managed to stay just ahead of the average stack by mixing up my play and picking my victims carefully. As the bubble approached I began to steal as much as I could if I could get in first – often asking the medium stacks whether or not they wanted to play for all their chips, particularly the ones who were shopping themselves by chatting about how tense things were getting – the prize money for 11th to 20th place was just $10 for heaven’s sake! I got myself as high as 7th place with 31 players remaining. I was pleased that I didn’t need to come from behind in a hand at any point, but I didn’t have anybody get lucky against me either. Only once did I get involved in a race (with my TT against KQs), otherwise I was always ahead when the cards were on their backs. After two and a half hours of play, I eventually finished 20th out of a field of 242, finishing just in the money after some cold cards and bad position ended my night. As I said, this was the best I had ever done in a field of this size and I felt like I’d proved something to myself. It’s fantastic to see your own good play rewarded with solid results (and cash too, even if it’s only $10) so I was really enthusiastic about the next four nights.

In fact, I gave the Friday freeroll a miss, but I was back on Saturday only to go out after getting appalling cards dealt to me for fifty minutes. There wasn’t a lot I could’ve done about this one. There were too many people willing to call with anything for me to try making any moves. Monday was much the same, although I stayed afloat a little bit longer with some very selective aggression against a half-decent table. Eventually I had to push with an ace and lost a race.

But it was Sunday night’s exit that provided the biggest lesson. I’m conscious of not going into too much detail with hand histories, so I’ll try to just stick to the facts with this one. Anyway, I re-raised with 99 from middle position after the player on my right raised to double the big blind. Everyone else folded. The original raiser called. The flop came a beautiful 953 rainbow and I had a great chance to double through and get myself over that “first sixty minutes” hurdle once again. My opponent bet the minimum 150 into an 1100 pot. I called. The turn brought a 3 to give me a full house. Again there was a minimum bet of 150 into what was now a 1400 pot. Once again, I called, sensing a chance to take all her chips. The river brought a K. This time the bet was 450 into a 1700 pot, leaving her just 400 more. Convinced I had this won against an A9, or a K5, I went all-in for my last 1100, knowing that my opponent was pot-committed, only to be called and shown pocket Ks to lose to a bigger full house. Nooooo!

Okay, so it was a two-outer, but I think a big bet from me on fourth street could’ve ended the hand right there – the pot was big enough at that point to justify doing that and the weak bets coming from my opponent meant that I was unlikely to make significantly more than was already in the pot. Of course, the other possible holding from a weak opponent was a big pair and it’s not out of the question that I would’ve had a big bet called on fourth street with two pair (Ks and 3s) against my full house either, which arguably would’ve been a mistake at that point. Essentially, I got caught trying to extract the maximum from a very strong hand. I took a chance and lost, so no complaints. Next time I’m in a similar situation, I’ll be paying less attention to the “ching ching” noises in my head and thinking instead about how much more I can win from the hand and whether I need to end things quickly and decisively with a big bet.

So that was it – the freerolls were over. What started off very promisingly ended as a bit of a disappointment. Still, I was up $10. Now where did I leave my copy of “Small Stakes Hold’em”??

Power Poker System

May 19th, 2005  |  Published in Books, No Limit Holdem, Online Poker, Poker Theory

I’m not sure how, but a few days ago I ended up at a site offering something called the “Power Poker System”. The site was full of outlandish claims about how it would instantly transform your game and how they strictly limit the amount of copies that they can sell because it’s so explosively good. It all had the feel of a get-rich-quick scheme or an infomercial for a miraculous kitchen gadget, and with a ludicrous price tag of over £100 I was about to dismiss it – until I noticed some of the names involved.

The guide had been written by esteemed poker writer and commentator Jesse May. Also involved where players of the calibre of Padraig Parkinson and Julian Gardner. Parkinson and May had featured quite heavily as commentators on the recent Party Poker World Open that was show here in the UK on channel five. I was surprised to learn that although Padraig was often keen to play down his own playing abilities while commentating, he had in fact come very close to winning the WSOP main event a few years ago.

The fact that these guys were involved at least made it worth investigating. So I had a look around for reviews. I found a post on the 2+2 forums which mentioned it. Many people were critical – both of the contents and the price – although I felt that most of the critics hadn’t seen the thing anyway.